| |
| Please note: If the download icon is not visible on this screen, this document is not available to non-members for download. Although the abstracts for all Technical Bulletins may be searched and viewed by the public, most are available only to NCASI members for download. Employees of NCASI member companies may login with a user name and password to access members-only resources.
|
| |
| Technical Bulletin No. 0706: Western States Nonpoint Source Program Review |
| Type: |
Technical Bulletin No. 0706 |
| Published: |
December 1995 |
| |
| File Size: |
6,343 KB |
Category: |
Reports |
| File Type: |
 |
(Adobe PDF) |
Frequency: |
As Needed |
|
|
|
| |
| Bibliographic Citation |
| National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI). 1995. Western States Nonpoint Source Program Review. Technical Bulletin No. 0706. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. |
| |
| Abstract |
This technical bulletin reviews state nonpoint source (NPS) control programs in the thirteen western states. All states were found to have active NPS control programs. State assessments show that forest practices are generally among the more modest sources of NPS pollution, despite the fact that forests cover 31 percent of the region. Exceptions to this general conclusion occur in several sub–state regions in which forestry is a major land use on landforms with high erosion potential. Rates of compliance with Best Management Practices (BMPs) are very high in some states but substantially lower in others. There has been extensive testing of forest practices in the West to ensure their effectiveness. Eight of the 13 western states have regulatory programs to control NPS pollution associated with forest management. Of those without regulatory programs, federal ownership of much of the forest land provides for consideration of water quality protection. Other states have authority through water quality or zoning regulations to protect forest water quality. BMP education and training need to be improved in some states, but there are aggressive programs in Oregon, California, Washington, and Montana.
Report preparation: Paul V. Ellefson, Antony S. Cheng, George Ice |
|
|